Recent Tragic Events by Craig Wright - 2m, 2w, 1 flexible
In one of the first plays to deal directly with 9/11, Craig Wright explores free will versus determinism and the idea of random chance in this character-driven ensemble play. It’s the evening of September 12, 2001 in Minneapolis, Minnesota. A clearly uncomfortable Andrew arrives at Waverly’s apartment for what turns out to be an ill-timed blind date. Unsure of dating protocol in the aftermath of a national tragedy, the evening is made all the more colorful by Waverly’s odd neighbor Ron and his sort-of girlfriend, Nancy. As if that wasn’t enough, Waverly is anxiously awaiting news about her twin sister, who may have worked at the World Trade Center. Of course, the entire story could have just as easily played out entirely differently. So says the Stage Manager, the play’s metatheatrical device who solicits an audience member to do a coin toss that will ostensibly determine the outcome of the show. Moments in the story that could have turned out differently had the coin toss yielded a different result are indicated by the sound of a bell, but as the Stage Manager later reveals, the story isn’t as dictated by random chance as we think. Recent Tragic Events is a philosophical, if not quirky, response to the existential questions raised in the aftermath of 9/11.
5 Comments:
This is a strange play. The major positive is that it occurs in Minneapolis. For someone who was stranded in San Francisco on 911, I find it hard to care about or relate to any of the characters. Do things occur by chance, or are they always going to happen the same way? An audience member flips a coin to determine course of the play, but it does nothing since the course is determined by the author. Joyce Carol Oates, the hand puppet character, is not The Joyce Carol Oates... even though by chance she has written all the same books word for word. Chance occurrences which happened previously are related during the course of the play.
The characters all have various internal personal issues. They talk about authors and books, most of which I have never heard of. The characters play some kind of drinking game apparently to keep their minds off what happened. Time is periodically interrupted by Waverley's phone ringing with possible information on her sister and whether she survived.
Finally, I see no point in having Nancy only wear a T shirt and when she is playing Joyce, a sock on her hand.
No for me.
I like the Meta-Theatricality of the piece with the "SM" being involved. Again (like 10 November) it would need to be the season opener as that is the 25th anniversary of 9/11. I worry about the tragic feeling of both of these plays, but I like the local relevance and think the play is a good fit for the intimacy of the arena and I found it both smart and emotional. I would say keep it on the list to see what Directors think.
I thought the characters and dialogue of this piece were really strong, really well written, fun to act and direct. The themes are interesting for our current moment with living in uncertain times and how to deal with unknowns. However, I honestly think it would be a stronger play without the metatheatrical stuff. I don't think it quite works with the full play - and I love weird stuff. I could go either way.
I thought it was very well written and fast paced. The characters were all a hot mess but interacted well with each other. It would make sense to open the season with it so it falls on the anniversary of 9/11, but I would not want to start our celebratory season with such a dark theme. I wasn't wild about the sock puppet or Nancy's genitals. I think I'll pass.
I so very much wanted to like this more than I did. I love Craig Wright's command of believable and moving dialogue. Alas, I think he ruined it with the metatheatrical twist and some other extraneous elements that he included. While I wouldn't be opposed to doing a play about 9/11, the play would need to have a lot more going for it to offset the depressing setting. So, it's a no for me.
Post a Comment
<< Home