Sep 1, 2022

The Cocktail Hour by Gurney (2m, 2w)

 THE STORY: The time is the mid '70s, the place a city in upstate New York. John, a playwright, returns to his family’s house, bringing with him a new play which he has written about them. His purpose is to obtain their permission to proceed with production, but his wealthy, very proper parents are cautious from the outset. For them the theatre is personified by the gracious, comforting era of the Lunts and Ina Claire, and they are disturbed by the bluntness of modern plays. And there is also John’s sister, Nina, to contend with, although her reservations have to do with the fact that John has given her character such a minor role. Their confrontation takes place during the ritual of the cocktail hour, and as the martinis flow so do the recriminations and revelations, both funny and poignant. In the end it is evident that what John has written is closer to the truth than his family has heretofore been willing to admit, and that beneath their WASP reserve his parents and siblings are as beset with uncertainties and frustrations as their presumed “inferiors.” But while they seem shackled by the past, and tantalized by an alien future, the ties which bind them do prevail—surmounting disputes and disappointments and, with unfailing warmth and humor, converting pained resignation into cautious but hopeful anticipation.

Labels:

8 Comments:

Blogger Jean said...

I really like this play and think it would be good to remount at TRP. The dialog is very witty and funny, and the family dynamics resonate with anybody. Very entertaining! Ywa for me.

12:16 PM  
Blogger Don said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

2:31 AM  
Blogger Howard said...

I like this play. I enjoy the family dynamic and Gurney's sense of humor. Yes for me.

4:41 PM  
Blogger lsa said...

I think this play was fine in its day but I'm not sure its day is still here. I now lack the sympathy for entitled people who all seem to be mad about something but I'm not sure what they have to be angry about. The references to certain famous actors will not be the least bit relevant to any except our oldest audience members - which is fine - but I do not see this as an engaging play for any younger patrons. So no, I think there are better plays.

8:38 AM  
Blogger Larisa said...

I found this to be very dry and the whole first act felt very repetitive. It gets stuck in the "don't do the play/I won't do the play/don't do the play/I won't do the play" for so long. It also felt like a story that has been told so many different times in different (and often better ways). Super WASP-y, middle-aged man with daddy issues. It just was not compelling to me. I think Peter Pan on her 70th birthday has similar family dynamics, but is more interesting.

12:01 PM  
Blogger Scott G said...

The first play I ever directed was a Gurney (Sweet Sue) but I think his time has past. I remember seeing the production years ago at TRP, but re-reading this made me long for something (anything) original about the characters. We are very much at a point where we need to be telling interesting and compelling stories in order to maintain audience and grow an audience base and this is not it. No from me.

6:30 PM  
Blogger K.C. said...

It's "ditto" for me. I think this play was fine in it's day, and I enjoyed TRP's last production, but can see no valid reason for resurrecting it. I, too, love much of Gurney's writing but this one feels its age.

3:37 PM  
Blogger Don said...

I was a little intrigued at first, but I wasn't sold by the end. As a whole, the story gives off very privileged messages. And it's heavily implied (without saying it) that the family is white. Western Theatre has produced enough WASP stories, I don't think we need to add another one if we can help it.

3:53 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home